Tag: United States

The possible refusal of the President of Mexico to come to the summit of the Americas will interfere with the intention of the Biden administration to conclude an agreement on illegal migration. The United States is also concerned about the likely non-participation of the President of Brazil in the meeting. pointed out the risks for the United States in a boycott of the Summit of the Americas by countries” />

Joe Biden

A growing number of Latin American and Caribbean heads of state are considering withdrawing from the Summit of the Americas due in Los Angeles in June, writes The New York Times.

Including — Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, the newspaper reported, citing Brazilian officials. According to the newspaper, the Brazilian leader has a cool relationship with Washington, and the summit was supposed to be Bolsonaro's first meeting with US President Joe Biden.

Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador may also miss the summit: he said he would not come to the meeting unless representatives of Cuba, Venezuela and Nicaragua were invited to it. Juan González, senior director of Western Hemisphere affairs at the US National Security Council, had earlier suggested this possibility.

The Mexican president was supported by the leaders of Bolivia and Honduras. Countries— members of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) also threatened to boycott the summit if Venezuela was represented at it not by President Nicolas Maduro, but by opposition leader Juan Guaido (the United States recognizes the latter as interim head of state).

As the newspaper notes, the boycott threats highlight the problems that the Biden administration is facing. Ahead of the mid-term elections to be held in the fall of 2022, the US administration is seeking an effective regional agreement on illegal migration, according to a New York Times source. The absence of the Mexican president from the summit will make his conclusion more difficult.

Bolsonaro's failure to attend the meeting jeopardizes the achievement of two other significant foreign policy goals of the Biden administration, which are related to the issue of climate change and the defense of democracy, the newspaper writes. The NYT notes that during the Biden presidency, Brazil moved closer to Russia, Bolsonaro expanded the deforestation of the Amazon and “questioned the integrity of elections in his own country.”

Read on RBC Pro Pro Gas supplies to the EU are falling. What will happen to Gazprom shares? Forecasts Pro How the conditions for buying a residence permit abroad have changed due to sanctions: an overview in line for cloud services. What services are in demand Pro Articles Why CNN+ shut down and what will happen to other streaming services Pro Articles Not all international business is gone. How to Build Communications for the Remaining Instructions Pro Development “without interference”: what analysts said about the crisis of 2008 Articles

At the meeting, the US and other countries could try to pressure Bolsonaro to “respect the democratic process”; and publicly supported his country's electoral system. However, according to the NYT source, the summit of the Americas is not on Bolsonaro's schedule. The fact that the Brazilian leader does not plan to participate in the meeting was also reported by Reuters.

Bolsonaro's administration told the newspaper that they had not received any information about the timing of the summit. Brazilian Vice President Amilton Mourán said Bolsonaro has not yet decided whether to attend the meeting.

The US authorities have not yet issued official invitations to the summit; The White House previously said they had not yet made a final decision on the guest list. A spokesman for the US National Security Council, who is helping organize the event, told the NYT that the upcoming summit— “the most important event for the Biden administration in our hemisphere,” and added that formal invitations would be sent out shortly. Both the NSC and the State Department declined to comment on boycott threats.

Summit of the Americas— organized under the auspices of the Organization of American States (OAS) meeting of the heads of state and government of America. Its goal is to form a common strategy in solving the problems facing the countries of the region. It was first held in 1994 in Miami. This year, the meeting is scheduled for June 6 & 10 in Los Angeles.

Article content Authors Tags Subscribe to Telegram

Источник rbc.ru

Video

American President Joe Biden during his speech at the US summit— ASEAN made a reservation and named its Vice President Kamala Harris head of state.

During his speech, he called the Indo-Pacific region free, open, stable and prosperous. “That's why I asked President Harris to go there last August,” said Biden.

Article content Tags Subscribe to RuTube RBC Live broadcasts, videos and recordings of programs on our RuTube channel

Источник rbc.ru

The FBI agents tried to recruit the head of the correspondence center of one of the Russian media, the Foreign Ministry said. Washington is also trying to interfere with the work of journalists who do not cover events the way the United States would like, according to the department

Agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) of the United States tried to recruit the head of the correspondent office of one of the Russian media outlets in Washington, according to a comment by the official representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Maria Zakharova.

According to Zakharova, the United States is trying to make it as difficult as possible for the activities of Russian accredited journalists or intimidate them into leaving.

“The next example of this unprecedented pressure was two “approaches” agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation to the head of the bureau of one of the Russian media in Washington. The goal is obvious— unbalance the journalist and try to involve him in compromising “collaboration”,— said the official representative of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. “Didn't work,” — she said.

The pressure, according to Zakharova, is subjected to correspondents who cover events “not in the way that Washington agitprop would like.” The Ministry of Foreign Affairs demanded an immediate end to the “treatment of Russian journalists” by providing them with normal working conditions in accordance with “free speech standards.”

In March, the Washington Post reported that the FBI used Russian-language advertising on social media Google platforms to persuade employees of the Russian embassy in Washington to cooperate. The secret service allegedly expects that some of the staff of the diplomatic mission does not support the military operation in Ukraine and therefore wants to help American intelligence.

Targeted advertising appeared when using mobile devices only on the territory of the embassy and in the immediate vicinity. A person interested in the advertisement can follow the link in the advertisement to the page of the FBI counterintelligence program, where potential informants are invited to visit the office of the bureau.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Dictator- innovator: how the putschist became the creator of the economic miracle Articles Pro More than 25% of newcomers leave the company almost immediately. How to keep them Instructions Pro When the employer's generosity in paying bonuses will interest the Federal Tax Service – cases Cases Pro Pick up IKEA customers: how advertising campaigns worked after February 24 Checklist for IT Employees How To Pro When Ideas Can't Catch Your Head: Seven Tactics for Unleashing Team Creativity How To Pro Not all international business is gone. How to build communications for the rest Instructions Materials for the article Authors Tags Subscribe to RuTube RBC Live broadcasts, videos and recordings of programs on our RuTube channel

Источник rbc.ru

Pentagon chief Lloyd Austin: Russia's nuclear arsenal is and will remain a threat According to Lloyd Austin, the threat from the Russian nuclear arsenal will not disappear in the future. The Russian Foreign Ministry said that the West is talking about nuclear war, and Russia believes that there can be no winners in such a conflict

Lloyd Austin

The head of the US Department of Defense, Lloyd Austin, spoke of the “significant problems” posed to the United States by the Russian nuclear arsenal. This is stated in a statement by the head of the Pentagon at a hearing in the US House Appropriations Committee.

“As we have seen in recent weeks, Russia remains a strong threat that requires close and constant coordination within NATO to prevent further aggression in Europe. <…> Russia's nuclear potential also creates significant problems now and will create in the future, — Austin said.

According to him, Russia's actions in Ukraine pose a “threat to transatlantic security.”

Austin added that Washington sees a threat not only in Russia and, as previously stated, in China. “We must remain vigilant for other dangers as well. We face a constant threat from North Korea, its nuclear arsenal and missile programs under development, as well as from Iran, with its nuclear ambitions and support for groups that threaten the security of our forces and our allies. said the head of the Pentagon.

On February 27, a few days after the start of the special operation in Ukraine, Vladimir Putin ordered the deterrence forces to be placed on a special alert regime due to the fact that “the highest officials of the leading NATO countries allow aggressive statements.” towards Russia. Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov then said that there was talk in the world about the possibility of nuclear war, but not by Russia, but by NATO, Western countries and Ukraine.

On March 24, The New York Times reported, citing sources, that the White House has formed a team of officials to develop a response plan for Washington and its allies in the event that Moscow uses nuclear weapons. At the same time, the publication quotes officials, the United States considers such a scenario unlikely.

Read on RBC Pro Pro How to get a preferential mortgage: a checklist for employees of IT companies Instructions Pro Business is in line for cloud services. What services are in demand Articles Pro Not all international business is gone. How to build communications for the rest Instructions Pro Risks of layoffs: how not to fall into the trap Instructions Pro The ghost of a checkered bag: why parallel imports will not return shuttles Forecasts Pro It's all right: how to switch to Russian ERP and what to choose in a crisis and not burn out Articles Pro x The Economist Why economists and ordinary people estimate inflation differently Articles

Putin's spokesman Dmitry Peskov clarified on March 29 that Russia is not considering using nuclear weapons in connection with the operation in Ukraine. “We have a concept of security that states very clearly that only when there is a threat to the existence of our country, we can and will use nuclear weapons to eliminate this threat,” — he said.

The conditions for the use of nuclear weapons by Russia are described in paragraph 27 of the Military Doctrine. It states that Russia reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in response to the use of nuclear and other types of weapons of mass destruction against it or its allies, as well as in the event of aggression against Russia with the use of conventional weapons, “when the very existence of the state is threatened.” ;.

On May 6, Alexei Zaitsev, Deputy Director of the Information and Press Department of the Russian Foreign Ministry, said at a briefing that Russia would not violate scenarios for the possible use of nuclear weapons. “The scenarios for our possible use of nuclear weapons are clearly spelled out in Russian doctrinal documents. They are not applicable to the implementation of the tasks set in the course of a special military operation in Ukraine,»,— he explained.

According to Zaitsev, Moscow adheres to the idea that there can be no winners in a nuclear war and it should not be unleashed.

Article content Authors Tags Subscribe to Telegram RBC Stay informed the latest news even in conditions of blocking

Источник rbc.ru

Ministry of Defense: Russian aviation shot down Ukrainian Su-24 and Su-27 off Zmeiny Island Accumulations of weapons from Western countries were destroyed in the Odessa and Nikolaev regions. Several planes, helicopters and drones were shot down near Zmeiny Island,

From May 1 to May 26, Defender Europe and Swift Response maneuvers will take place in Poland and eight other countries, 18 thousand military personnel from more than 20 states will take part in them

Military exercises began in Poland Defender Europe 2022, according to the website of the Ministry of Defense of the Republic.

The Defender Europe and Swift Response 2022 (airborne troops) maneuvers, which will take place from May 1 to 26 in Poland and eight other countries, will be attended by 18,000 military personnel from more than 20 states, including about 7,000 military personnel and 3 thousand pieces of equipment in Poland. In addition to Polish military personnel, military personnel from the US, France, Sweden, Germany, Denmark and the UK will take part in them.

Defender Europe exercises will be held under the command of the 5th Corps of the US Army. “During the exercises, the ability of soldiers to interact in a joint combat operation will be tested,” — reported in the Polish Ministry of Defense. They include the movement of troops to overcome water barriers and fire training.

Defender Europe and Swift Response— defensive exercises that “are not directed against any country and are not related to the current geopolitical situation in the region,” the military department noted. They were planned for 2021.

On April 28, the Polish Ministry of Defense warned about the movement of military equipment due to exercises in the West Pomeranian, Lubusz, Wielkopolska, Kuyavian-Pomeranian, Lodz, Mazowiecki, Lublin and Warmia-Mazury voivodeships. The Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship borders on the Kaliningrad Region of Russia, West Pomeranian and Lubuskie— with Germany, Lublin— with Ukraine.

Great Britain intends to send about 8,000 troops for exercises in Eastern Europe, The Guardian newspaper wrote. The maneuvers will take place in the summer and will be one of the largest since the Cold War. Their goal— practicing actions to combat “Russian aggression”.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Do not follow the crowd: is it profitable to invest in crowdlending now? how Zappos built the most unusual strategy Articles Pro How an accountant created India's largest bank for the poor for $6 billion Articles

According to the publication, exercises are planned in some countries from Finland to North Macedonia, they will involve tens of thousands of military personnel from NATO countries and the Joint Expeditionary Force (the alliance was created in 2014, in which Great Britain, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Latvia, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden participate).

Mater Links to the article Authors Tags Subscribe to VK RBC Get news faster than anyone else

Источник rbc.ru

The director of the Foreign Ministry's arms control department said that Washington “frozen” the dialogue on strategic stability and there are no prospects for discussion now: the United States, according to the diplomat, is going in the opposite direction

Washington wants to see Moscow's reaction to the aggravation: will there be a landing

The situation in Transnistria continues to heat up. A series of sabotage in Tiraspol and the Grigoriopol region continued. Now, according to reports from the field, a Ukrainian sabotage and reconnaissance group has been seen near the military warehouses in Kolbasna, and a drone has been seen over the largest arsenal in Europe. MK asked Vladimir Bruter, an expert from the International Institute for Humanitarian and Political Studies, to assess the situation.

Tiraspol. Photo: Global Look Press

– It's real. Actually, Zelensky's office today confirmed that they are ready to seize Transnistria. What doubts can there be?

Here is another question. Of course, the liquidation of Transnistria is not in Washington's plans at all. It is clear that the Transnistrian Republic can be liquidated fairly quickly. The question is, what will follow?

I think Washington plans to provoke Russia into more intense military action, or at least see how Russia will react to such provocations.

Washington, most likely, does not like the fact that they cannot understand the logic and timing of the current stage of the Russian special military operation. And that's why they want to “cheer up” the situation a little.

– Yes. They want to simulate the opening of a “second front” and see if the Russians will quickly break through to Odessa? Will they land troops? Will the number of combat sorties and missile attacks be increased? Well, and the like.

The point is that, strange as it may seem, Washington is also not interested in a very long delay in the Russian military operation. First of all, because if it is long and at the same time moves in favor of Russia, then this will greatly affect the autumn midterm elections in the United States.

The states need to decide: either they can impose on Russia some kind of losing for her tactics, or they need to switch to something else.

– I do not think that Transnistria has a serious chance against the Ukrainian military machine. The Ukrainian army is not as weak as many portray.

– It seems that the Ukrainians can simply try to provoke another series of explosions. They, in my opinion, are not even aware of how these ammunition correspond to the nomenclature that they need. Moreover, in order to capture this arsenal, it will take some time, forces are needed.

In the end, if there is a threat of capture, the Pridnestrovians themselves can blow it up to make it inaccessible to the Ukrainian army.

p>

Therefore, I think that control of this arsenal by the Ukrainian army is possible as an option, but still less likely than just creating general chaos. This chaos will be the basis for, for example, to send troops to Transnistria. It will be possible, in any case, to talk about it. Like, look, Pridnestrovie cannot cope, cannot ensure the security of the repository, and this is a threat to the whole world.

– This is quite possible. In any case, the fact that they sent drones towards the arsenals is a fact in itself indicative. This means that, most likely, they want to provoke something from the air, and are not planning a ground operation right now. But a ground operation cannot be ruled out either.

Источник www.mk.ru

Ambassador Antonov accused the US authorities of blocking the work of the Russian embassy Bank of America closed the accounts of two Russian consulates general, the work of the embassy in Washington was blocked, and diplomats receive threats, said Anatoly Antonov

Consulate General of the Russian Federation in New York, USA

The activities of the Russian embassy in the USA are “under blockade” from Washington, said on the air of the channel “Russia 1” head of the diplomatic mission Anatoly Antonov. “The accounts of our two consulates-general in Houston and New York have been closed by the Bank of America,” he said.

In addition, Antonov said, the embassy staff received threats, for some time they were blocked from leaving the diplomatic mission. “There were fairly numerous demonstrations, there were acts of vandalism, they poured paint over it,” — Ambassador added.

Last November, the Russian Foreign Ministry said that a total of six objects had been confiscated from Russia in the United States. In December 2016, the administration of President Barack Obama, as part of sanctions against Moscow, closed two country residences of Russian diplomats in New York and Maryland and expelled several dozen Russian diplomats. Under the next US President Donald Trump, the Russian consulates in San Francisco, Seattle and New York, as well as Russian trade missions, were closed.

As the Russian ministry pointed out, diplomats do not have access to these buildings and do not know the state of the utilities and the material values ​​​​left there, and the issue of blocked property in the United States remains a “sharp irritant”; for Moscow in relations with Washington.

Since April 2021, due to a new aggravation between the two countries, dozens of Russian diplomats have left the United States, in connection with which, according to Antonov, the Russian representation in the United States is facing a “serious personnel shortage.” Russia retaliated; in addition, President Vladimir Putin ordered to limit the admission of Russians or third-country nationals to work in the diplomatic missions of “unfriendly” Russia countries. The US State Department then stated that the embassy in Russia, due to a lack of staff, limited its work to the performance of technical functions: the staff of the embassy has been reduced from 1,200 to 120 people since 2017.

In January, Antonov said that the State Department had put the question of his departure from the country if Russia does not issue visas to the guards of the American ambassador in Moscow. A month later, according to the diplomat, the situation has not changed.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Dialogue is needed: how product manufacturers respond to sanctions Articles Pro The company has suspended business in Russia. What to prepare for its director Articles Pro Why Russia finds it difficult to sell more in China Articles Pro How John Rockefeller became the richest man in the world. History of Standard Oil Articles Pro Russians switched to crisis shopping models: what and where they buy Researches Pro European ports are closed to Russia. How to transport goods from China now Articles Pro How the development of surgical instruments made an immigrant a billionaire Articles Pro I listen, but I hear the wrong thing: how to deal with communication distortions Instructions with the administration of President Joe Biden, but diplomats lack contact with senior officials. According to the ambassador, they refused to meet him several times after Biden was elected head of state.

Article content Authors Tags Subscribe to VK RBC Get news faster than anyone

Источник rbc.ru

Beijing's agreement with a small country in Oceania has caused Washington's displeasure

A new knot of geopolitical contradictions is being tied between the US and China. Their focus is not Taiwan or the disputed islands in East Asia, but the Solomon Islands, located in Oceania, which has concluded a security agreement with Beijing. This pact was of particular concern not only to neighboring Australia, but also to the United States.

Photo: Global Look Press

After Australia failed to convince the Solomon Islands to wreck a security deal with China, senior US officials planned to visit the island nation to try to revoke a security pact already signed, China's Global Times writes.

White House coordinator for the Indo-Pacific region Kurt Campbell and a senior State Department official for Asia will travel to the Solomon Islands, the White House said amid “concerns” that the Pacific island nation is striking a security pact with China, Reuters reported.

>

Observers noted that the “concern” expressed by the US and Australia about the security pact indicates that they are using the South Pacific region as an “arena” to compete with Beijing and try to contain the development of China. Analysts predict that the US and Australia may increase military cooperation and civilian investment in the Solomon Islands and other South Pacific countries to counter growing Chinese influence, but history shows that US promises are often difficult to keep and such cooperation rarely brings real value. to ordinary people, Global Times notes.

Campbell's visit comes after Washington repeatedly warned the Solomon Islands about a security pact with China, and Australia made several threats under the guise of “concern” and sent to the island nation high-ranking officials.

Yang Honglian, senior fellow at the Pacific Islands Research Center at Fiji-based Liaocheng University, told the Global Times that in the mentality of the US and its Cold War successors in Australia, the South Pacific countries are always seen as “backyard.” They believe that controlling the island nations through military deployment can keep their influence in the region, so they suggested that Beijing would take the same step even if China did not conduct any military activities in the region. П

Chinese State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi and Solomon Islands Foreign Minister Jeremiah Manele officially signed a framework agreement on security cooperation between the two countries, the Chinese Foreign Ministry confirmed on Tuesday.

The signing of the security agreement provoked a hysterical reaction Washington after witnessing Canberra's failure to change China-Solomon Islands cooperation, said Chen Hong, president of the Chinese Association of Australian Studies and director of the Center for Australian Studies at East China Normal University.

The United States and its “agent” in the Asia-Pacific region – Australia – have repeatedly put pressure on the Solomon Islands. “This is not only interference in the internal affairs of the Solomon Islands, but also a provocation against Chinese diplomacy,” Chen told the Global Times on Tuesday.

The expert noted that Washington sees the South Pacific as an important “foothold” against China as it sought to further push its Indo-Pacific strategy across the region and put pressure on Beijing over the South China Sea and Taiwan. “But we see that the Solomon Islands have defended their sovereignty, independence and the right to make their own decisions, demonstrating political wisdom and determination. That is why the US is now putting Australia on the sidelines and intervening more directly in the region,” Chen said.

Meanwhile, Solomon Islands Prime Minister Manasseh Sogaware is defending the security pact his government signed with China on Tuesday. He told Parliament that an agreement with Beijing was needed to address the country's “internal security situation.”

The Pacific island nation has long struggled with political unrest, most recently in November 2021 when protesters targeted the Chinese capital Honiara and tried to storm the prime minister's residence.

The Australian Police contingent helped restore stability at the request of the government. Australia also took the lead in the 2003 multilateral mission following violence and a coup in the late 1990s.

Canberra raised alarm about the pact with China when the draft agreement was leaked online in March and tried to encourage Sogaware to replay the plans . The United States and New Zealand have also raised concerns amid concerns that it could lead to China establishing a military outpost in the Pacific.

Mark Harrison, senior lecturer in Chinese studies at the University of Tasmania, told Al Jazeera that the PRC-Solomon Islands deal was a “disaster” for Australia, whose relationship with Beijing has long been strained. “This is another challenging step for Australia to reassess its future in a China-dominated region,” Harrison said. “Australia completely misjudged the impact of China's rise in the early 2010s and the reassessment has been slow and ambiguous and still has a long way to go.”

The Solomon Islands, with a population of less than 700,000, are a chain of hundreds of islands that lie east of Papua New Guinea in the Pacific Ocean. The capital, Honiara, is located on the island of Guadalcanal, the site of a fierce battle between American and Japanese forces during World War II.

The former British colony has been facing unrest since the late 1990s as ethnic tensions turned violent, and in 2000 Sogaware first came to power in a coup. With the country on the brink of political and economic collapse, Australia and New Zealand sent in troops, stability was restored, and a peace agreement was signed. The calm did not last long.

Sogaware was re-elected as prime minister in 2019, and a few months later decided to break off the Solomon Islands' longstanding diplomatic relationship with Taiwan in favor of Beijing. The move did not sit well with everyone in the Solomon Islands and Daniel Suidani, premier of Malaita province, rejected the move, saying he would seek independence for Malaita, the country's largest province.

A leaked draft deal between Beijing and Honiara said the pact would allow Chinese warships to stop in the Solomon Islands and Chinese police would be deployed at the request of the island nation to maintain “public order.” Neither side will be allowed to publicly disclose mission information without the written consent of the other side.

Premier Sogaware explained to Parliament on Wednesday, saying the pact was in line with international and domestic law.

Sogaware had previously said that the Solomon Islands had “no intention of… asking China to build a military base,” and stressed on Wednesday that the deal was “guided by our national interest.”

Australia, which has had a security deal with Honiara since 2017, has become the loudest critic of the deal, but other Pacific nations, including the US and New Zealand, have also raised concerns. Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison, who is in the midst of a general election campaign, said Wednesday that the signing of the pact indicates “intense pressure” from China on the Pacific island nations.

In a statement Wednesday , officials from Australia, the United States, New Zealand and Japan expressed “general concern about the security system and its serious risks to a free and open Indo-Pacific.”

China is already a major export destination for the Solomon Islands, buying about 65 percent of Honiara's exports in 2019, and the PRC is the source of just under a quarter of the island country's imports, followed by Australia with 13 percent.

In announcing the security deal, Beijing called it “normal exchange and cooperation between two sovereign and independent countries.”

Foreign Ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin said the Western powers were “deliberately exaggerating reveal tensions” in connection with the pact.

Источник www.mk.ru

“Lucky with skin color”

The United States has officially received only 12 Ukrainian refugees so far instead of the promised 100,000. “Attraction of unheard of generosity” for fugitive Ukrainians was promised by President Joe Biden at the beginning of the Russian military special operation. However, the real scale of hospitality of the “world hegemon” turned out to be much more modest.

Photo: AP

“This is US policy in all situations — promise a lot and do nothing when it comes to really helping people. – the head of the International Action Center and the coordinator of the “Sanctions kill” campaign said on RT; Sarah Flounders.

She also recalled that the United States is no stranger to “feeding” refugees empty hopes. The White House followed the same pattern with refugees from Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq and Libya. In other words, “in any country where the United States instigates a war and supports it on  over the years,” Flounders emphasized. 

Despite the fact that the lion's share of Ukrainians poured into the countries of the Eurozone and Russia, they have much more chances to end up in the United States than the Syrians or Afghans. As explained by “MK” expert on migration processes, head of the Good Neighbor Foundation; Yuri Moskovsky, there are two reasons for this. The first in the spirit of “stars and stripes” – benefit for their own economy and the ability to print a new batch of dollars. The second is more in the tradition of those who at one time escaped the Nuremberg Tribunal and took refuge in the territory of America: Ukrainians were lucky with their skin color.

– Every refugee — this is a reason to allocate money from the budget and a stimulus for the development of the economy. Americans will simply print more money, integrate these people into their economy, and profit as a result. Refugees — it's a huge resource. But most importantly, although the United States does not declare this anywhere, both they and Canada informally prefer to host “whites”. The racial issue is very acute there. This is also evidenced by the reduction in the black population in the United States in recent years, – Yuri Moskovsky explained. only 12 people received by the White House from Ukraine since the beginning of the Russian special operation — according to the expert, they speak more about the bureaucratic difficulties of crossing the American border than about anything else.

– Now entry into the United States is possible only with a visa, so the official number of refugees is so small, – says Moskovsky, – Although in reality there may be more of these people. I believe that in the near future the Americans can establish purely technological processes and simplify entry. They benefit from refugees from Ukraine. Although people run first of all to where they have friends and where it is easier to get logistically. Therefore, the main flow goes to European countries and Russia.

According to the expert, there are now more than a million refugees from Ukraine in our country. Several tens of thousands of people are placed in temporary camps. The rest — this is about 95% – they traveled on their own.

– I have friends from Kyiv who traveled to Russia through the Baltic states. There was no other way to get — the borders are closed,” the expert said and stressed that many people who were forced to leave Ukraine for Russia due to hostilities are still in an illegal position.

Yuriy Moskovsky is sure that people who come from Ukraine should be given urgently the status of refugees and in a simplified, shortened procedure for two to three months to give Russian citizenship. Without refugee status, a person can only work on a patent, moreover, according to our laws, he can stay in the country for only 90 days within 180 days, otherwise – expulsion. Plus, for any two offenses, he will also be deported.

– If we give refugees a legal status, our economy will receive a huge boost. After the pandemic, she especially needs working hands. We are short of about 15 million workers, lamented a migration expert.

Источник www.mk.ru

[Intro]
Behold the soft cyber caress
My television whose my lover
But jealous machines and devices
Struggle to find a light switch
Followers follow him, leading nowhere
Possible hope of a cyber safe house
Looming on the horizon behind us
Moving targets, targets
Moving targets for the markets
For the hopeless hopelessness prescribed – coping

[Verse]
Yeah
I’m from the United States of Amurderca myself
Now we post-language baby, we talk with guns, man
Guns keep us safe
We don’t imagine past the image
Please, you know us
We killed love, we killed money, we killed money
We killed prince
We killed shame
We killed hope
We killed sex
We killed pride
We killed style
We killed imagination
We killed fresh
We killed the game
We killed air
We killed dope
We killed dough
We killed death (body them, here he comes)
Shooting these rhymes
Bottling time
Falling in graces
It’s the coming of ageless
Turning the pages (flip)
Driving them ape shit
Recording with tape hiss
A glitch in the matrix

Pay attention close you kids
This the shit don’t got no lid
No gangster sound, no pop, no trend
My killer beat is not your friend
I come to throne to stop these things
I drop, they drop. they lose, we cruise
I give a fuck about some rules
We break em’ like we broke Don’s heart
I always roll the dice I’m cool
Could never follow crowds, too smart
I rock a big old jewel king crown
My girl be in a gorgeous queen gown
The filthier the word spreads round
I drown these clowns through my sound
Yo it’s going down (down, down)
Salute the noble sound (sound, clown)
I’ve been around the world ten times
I got the milky way crack flow
Me and my mother in Rio
Focus how I pop these rhymes

Lightning in a bottle
Rappers, it’s a slaughter
Styled up in my parlor (fresh)
Dressed up in my armor
Constellation squad up
Mashing on the throttle
I got pretty daughters
All the pretty daughters holla

We killed cyber
We killed rich
We killed time
We killed cameras
We killed nude
We killed space
We killed freedom
We killed obsessions
We killed facts
We killed attention
We killed the tension
We killed pardons
We killed
We killed
We killed

[Outro]
Clip love to the worldicidal maniacs
High up joints rolled off the consumer class
Dead dreams
Way up at the bottom in the green towers built with the data stones
Freaks of fear, drinking tears and stealing years